Rebel and Kit Lens Challenge!

I recently had a con­ver­sa­tion with some fel­low pho­tog­ra­phers about lens rec­om­men­da­tions for a begin­ner.  As usual, up came the topic of the much maligned “kit lens”–usually a small­ish aper­ture, pla­s­ticky mid-range zoom lens that trades on the used mar­ket for ~$100.  It doesn’t mat­ter if it’s from Canon, Nikon, Sony, or Pen­tax, the “kit lens” has become a deroga­tory phrase used to describe what most would call a mediocre lens.

How­ever, the kit lens is use­ful for a lot of rea­sons, just as a fast prime, like a 50mm f/1.8 or sim­i­lar (I men­tion this one because it’s usu­ally the OTHER begin­ner lens that peo­ple rec­om­mend) is use­ful as a learn­ing tool.  With a cheap midrange zoom, the new pho­tog­ra­pher isn’t plung­ing deep into the expen­sive waters of fast, pro­fes­sional glass, and he or she has the oppor­tu­nity to try var­i­ous focal lengths to find what suits them best.  He might shoot for a while, find that he is always on the 55mm end of the lens and decide he needs some­thing longer, like a tele­photo.  Or she might find that she enjoys shoot­ing epic land­scapes, and that a wide angle lens is right for her.  Or they both might decide that that the kit lens is lim­it­ing because of it’s small­ish aper­tures, and move on to a fast prime for shal­lower DOF and bet­ter sub­ject separation.

Wher­ever it leads, the kit lens is a good tool for gen­eral pho­tog­ra­phy, and for help­ing to ori­ent some­one to var­i­ous focal lengths and pho­tog­ra­phy in gen­eral.  What does all this have to do with a chal­lenge, you say?

Well, the kit lens is oft-maligned because it is so fre­quently and mostly used by rank ama­teurs who may or may not be great photographers–in other words, a lot of garbage pho­tos get taken with the kit lens.  Gen­er­ally, unless some­one is very well off and/or enjoys expen­sive hob­bies, he’s not going to get started with top-shelf L primes or pro­fes­sional zooms (yes, I know, there are excep­tions to that rule).  Then there is the per­cep­tion that you need those expen­sive pro­fes­sional zooms to take great pho­tos, since most pros use them.  Indeed, the more expen­sive lenses are gen­er­ally opti­cally supe­rior, have larger max­i­mum aper­tures for more flex­i­bil­ity in dif­fer­ent light, and focus more quickly, but a lot of what pros are pay­ing for is for the dust and mois­ture seal­ing, the stur­dier build, the reli­a­bil­ity.  To trot out a tired anal­ogy, just because you have paint­brush doesn’t mean you can paint the Mona Lisa.  Sure, a nicer paint­brush might make it more pleas­ant to paint, and might save you some time (can paint brushes do that?), but the skill and the knowl­edge have to be there already to know what to do with that brush.

So here, finally, is the chal­lenge: I told my col­league, this pho­tog­ra­pher who sug­gested that the kit lens wasn’t good value for money, that I would take on the chal­lenge of shoot­ing a sal­able image with the kit lens, and include it amongst the images I was deliv­er­ing to a client.  So con­fi­dent am I that the lens can get the job done, I made this brash claim.  Only prob­lem is, I don’t have a cam­era that will take a Canon EF-S lens (APS-C sized sen­sors… if you don’t know what the heck I’m talk­ing about, it just means the lens won’t phys­i­cally mount on either of my cam­eras).  For­tu­nately, another esteemed col­league of mine has a Rebel XTi molder­ing away in his closet some­where, he hav­ing moved on to big­ger and bet­ter things.  He vol­un­teered to loan it to me if I bought the kit lens, and so the chal­lenge started com­ing together.

And so here we stand–the infa­mous kit lens–the Canon EF-S 18–55 f/3.5–5.6 lens that came stan­dard with the Rebel XT, 20D, and 30D–is on its way to me, and hope­fully soon after a Rebel XTi to which to mount it.  Once I have them both, I’ll bring them on a paid shoot and use the kit lens to prove that it’s up to the task.  It may be hubris, it may come from wild claims after hav­ing a lit­tle too much wine, but I have con­fi­dence that even in Canon’s lowly con­sumer line there is opti­cal qual­ity to be found.

And more impor­tantly, I’m fully con­fi­dent that it’s not really the gear that makes the dif­fer­ence, anyway.

Add A Comment